Table of contents
- What is Amazon Aurora?
- Aurora Database Cluster
- Aurora Features
- Amazon Aurora Use Cases
- What is Amazon RDS (Relational Database Service)?
- Amazon RDS Features
- Pros of RDS
- Cons of RDS
- Amazon RDS Use Cases
- Factors to Consider Before Deciding Between Aurora and RDS
- Comparison Between Amazon Aurora Vs RDS
- Conclusion
Databases are the main pillars of any application and are one of the most essential business infrastructure components. Additionally, database management services have become vital not only in on-premises but also in the cloud platform.
Database as a service (DBaaS), or Managed Databases, permits users to set up, operate, and scale databases without maintaining and managing their underlying technologies. It allows most organizations and individuals to opt for a cost efficient solution. Database administrators (DBA) face more challenges and problems while increasing workloads and database complexity as most IT organizations move towards an application centric approach.
Amazon Aurora is a relational database created especially for the cloud. It combines the accessibility and affordability of open source databases with the functionality and performance of standard enterprise databases. It is wholly managed and works with PostgreSQL and MySQL.
When comparing Amazon Aurora Vs Amazon RDS, Aurora offers a cloud native architecture with better scalability and availability, making it a preferred choice for high performance applications. RDS is a managed database service for SQL (Structured Query Language) offered by Amazon, much like Aurora. It supports various database engines for managing and storing data and includes relational database maintenance tasks, including data migration, backup and recovery, and patching.
In the Amazon Aurora vs RDS debate, RDS supports more database engines but with traditional architecture, while Aurora postgresql vs RDS postgresql highlights Aurora’s superior performance and automatic scaling. Overall, Amazon RDS vs Amazon Aurora decisions depend on workload requirements, cost considerations, and desired scalability.
In the debate about Amazon Aurora VS RDS, RDS supports more database engines, but the ones with classical architecture. At the same time, Aurora PostgreSQL VS RDS PostgreSQL emphasizes the greater performance with automatic scaling on the part of Aurora. Generally, the factors of workload, cost, and scale of the Amazon RDS VS Amazon Aurora kind of decisions come into play.
In 2025, Amazon Aurora continues to demonstrate its dominance as the fastest growing relational database service, experiencing a robust 150% year over year growth rate in 2024, as highlighted in the AWS re:Invent 2024 keynote. This exceptional growth is reflected in its market share, reaching 1.20%, making it a compelling choice for organizations seeking a robust and scalable database solution.
Widely adopted globally, Amazon Aurora boasts over 100,000 customers spanning 185 countries, cementing its position as a globally trusted platform (Source: Amazon Web Services website). Furthermore, the 2025 RightScale State of the Cloud Report affirms that Amazon Aurora is the go to choice for production workloads, emphasizing its reliability and performance in critical business operations.
Simultaneously, Amazon RDS maintains its status as the most popular relational database service, with a substantial 5% market share, catering to an impressive 2 million customers across more than 190 countries (Source: Amazon Web Services website). Its versatility is evident in its application across various workloads, including web, mobile, and enterprise applications, showcasing its adaptability to diverse organizational needs.
Amazon Aurora delivers over 500,000 SELECTs/sec and 100,000 UPDATEs/sec, five times higher than MySQL running the same benchmark on the same hardware. (Source: Amazon Web Services)
The 2025 RightScale State of the Cloud Report reinforces the cost-effectiveness of Amazon RDS, positioning it as a pragmatic solution for running relational databases in the cloud. In summary, these statistics underscore the widespread appeal, reliability, and cost effectiveness of Amazon Aurora and RDS in meeting organizations’ diverse demands globally.
Before opting for the best enterprise data management consulting for your organization, consider multiple factors, including security, scalability, monitoring, performance, high availability, management, capacity planning, and operational costs. If any organization wants to run its services in Amazon Web Service (AWS), there are two best platforms: Amazon Aurora and RDS. Both services offer multiple options to support database administration.
What Is Amazon Aurora and How Does It Work?
Amazon Aurora is a cutting edge relational database service that was created and offered by AWS in 2014. Amazon designed Aurora to work with MySQL 5.6 and PostgreSQL, which were built for the enterprise data management services. Aurora Postgres delivers five times better performance than MySQL and three times better than PostgreSQL, with the reliability, security, and availability of high end commercial AWS database services at one tenth the price.
In addition, Aurora PostgreSQL syncs with MySQL and PostgreSQL and offers various special features, such as security, durability, migration, and more. Moreover, it stunts maintenance costs without sacrificing performance.
AWS Aurora allocates the database storage volume in 10 GB logical blocks without your intervention, also known as the Protection group. The data available in the protection group is reproduced across six storage nodes, which are automatically allocated across three separate availability zones (AZs) in the Amazon Aurora cluster. If data fails in one AZ, it aims to recover it in another AZ.
When you create a cluster, it automatically consumes data. If data increases and exceeds storage capacity, the service engine seamlessly expands its volume to meet the requirement and auto scales up to 64 TB.
This dynamic scaling capability showcases the performance and flexibility of AWS Aurora vs RDS, making it a powerful option for organizations considering Amazon Aurora vs RDS for their workloads.
However, the real highlight lies in the dynamic scaling capability that shows the performance and flexibility of AWS Aurora vs RDS, thus making it the best alternative for organizations thinking of Amazon Aurora vs RDS for their specific workloads.
Aurora Database Cluster
This database engine consists of multiple DB instances and a cluster volume that primarily aims to hold the data for the DB instances. Aurora Postgres is a virtual database storage volume that spans various Availability Zones into a single AWS region and houses a copy of the DB cluster data. This is all about how your DB cluster can permit a failure of the Availability Zone without interruption of services and any data loss. Here, we have two Aurora DB instances: Primary DB and Aurora Replica.
This design exemplifies how your Aurora DB cluster can permit a failure of the Availability Zone without interruption of services and any data loss (Aurora PostgreSQL vs RDS PostgreSQL). This is geared towards providing high availability, data durability, and automated failover, these being the major benefits considered when evaluating Amazon RDS vs Amazon Aurora or AWS Aurora vs RDS for enterprise grade applications.
A) Primary DB Instance
This instance performs all data input modifications (read and write operations) to the cluster volume. Every cluster in this AWS database service consists of at least one primary DB instance.
B) Aurora Replica
Replica only supports read operations and joins the same data cluster as the primary DB instance connects. Each DB cluster can support up to 15 Aurora replicas, which can be distributed across the Availability Zones that a DB cluster spans across the AWS region.
Aurora Replica has two purposes. You can ask them to remove your application’s only read operations. It also helps to increase availability. If the writer DB instance fails and is unavailable in a single master cluster, the failover mechanism (Aurora) automatically approaches and replaces a new writer DB instance (Amazon Aurora vs RDS).
All DB instances can perform read/write operations in the Aurora database multi master cluster. Aurora Replica doesn’t apply to a primary instance’s notions in this particular case and is used for multiple read only operations (AWS Aurora vs RDS, Aurora PostgreSQL vs RDS PostgreSQL, Amazon RDS vs Amazon Aurora).
Useful Link: 10 Emerging Technologies That Make ‘Cloud’ Stand out!
What Features Make Amazon Aurora Suitable for Enterprise Use?
1) Availability and Durability
AWS Aurora offers a feature that is self healing and fault tolerant storage built for the cloud. It is designed to provide an excellent availability of 99.99%, and the cloud storage replicates six copies of your data that can be created across three Availability Zones. Furthermore, for safety purposes, it continuously backs up the data to Amazon S3.
2) Higher Security
This web service provides numerous levels of strong security for protecting your database, such as encryption at rest using AWS Key Management Service (KMS), encryption of data in transit operating SSL, and network isolation using Amazon VPC. The same cluster also provides automatic backups, replicas, and snapshots (AWS Aurora vs RDS, Amazon Aurora vs RDS, Aurora PostgreSQL vs RDS PostgreSQL, Amazon RDS vs Amazon Aurora).
For this reason, many companies compare AWS Aurora vs RDS, Amazon Aurora vs RDS, Aurora PostgreSQL vs RDS PostgreSQL, and Amazon RDS vs Amazon Aurora while picking their security and scaling database solution.
3) Fully Managed
An Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) manages the Amazon Aurora database. As a result, users don’t need to worry about database management services tasks like setup, configuration, backups, software patching, and hardware provisioning.
Organizations evaluating managed database services, such as AWS Aurora vs. RDS and Amazon Aurora vs. RDS, are considering this experience as one of the key reasons.
4) Migration Support
Amazon Aurora makes it simple to migrate your local database using MySQL dump and PostgreSQL dump commands.
This particular ease of transition is generally emphasized in Aurora PostgreSQL vs RDS PostgreSQL and Amazon RDS vs Amazon Aurora comparisons, especially when companies are bolstering their cloud migration strategies.
Useful Link: All You Need to Know about Artificial Intelligence as a Service (AIaaS)
What Are the Ideal Use Cases for Amazon Aurora?
1) Mission Critical Applications
Amazon Aurora is engineered for mission critical applications where high performance and availability are non negotiable. Examples include financial systems, healthcare databases, and other applications where downtime or performance degradation is unacceptable. Its architecture, with replication across multiple Availability Zones, ensures fault tolerance and reliability.
2) Mixed Workload Scenarios
In scenarios demanding a blend of read and write operations, such as e-commerce platforms and gaming applications, Amazon Aurora versus RDS shines. Aurora’s storage engine’s distributed nature allows for efficient handling of read and write queries, making it suitable for applications with dynamic and demanding workloads.
3) Compatibility Advantage
Amazon Aurora’s compatibility with MySQL and PostgreSQL is a significant advantage over RDS. Organizations leveraging these popular database engines can seamlessly transition to Aurora with minimal friction. This makes it an attractive option for businesses looking to enhance performance without undergoing significant database architecture changes.
4) Real Time Analytics
Amazon Aurora’s high performance capabilities make it an excellent choice for real time analytics applications. Businesses requiring instant insights into large datasets, such as those in the financial sector or online retail, can leverage Aurora’s robust architecture to handle complex queries and analytics workloads efficiently. The seamless integration with popular analytics tools enhances its suitability for organizations prioritizing data driven decision making.
5) Geographically Distributed Applications
Amazon Aurora’s multi AZ deployment options are advantageous for applications with a global user base or those requiring data distribution across different regions. Its ability to replicate data across multiple Availability Zones ensures low latency database access, enhancing the user experience. This makes Amazon Aurora a preferred choice for geographically distributed applications, such as content delivery platforms or global e-commerce solutions.
Useful Link: Serverless Vs Containers: Comparison Between Top Two Cloud Services
What is Amazon RDS (Relational Database Service)?
Amazon RDS is a cloud-based relational database service that allows you to manage and scale your application in the cloud. RDS supports multiple database engines, including Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle Database, MariaDB, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Amazon Aurora. It automatically backs up your database and updates the latest software.
The service engine offers various instant types with different resources, such as network capability, storage options, CPU, and memory. It is a fully managed RDBMS service.
With the AWS Command Line Interface and AWS Management Console, administrators can control RDS with the AWS Command Line Interface, which can decrease or increase your RDS requirements within minutes. These interfaces are used to deploy database instances to apply specific user settings. Additionally, RDS users can operate Access Management and AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to define and set permissions for accessing an RDS database.
What Features Make Amazon RDS Suitable for Enterprise Use?
- Amazon RDS automatically replaces the host if the hardware fails
- No upfront payment is needed, as an export database from Amazon RDS charges only for the resources consumed by the user. It also offers several Aurora serverless pricing models, including ‘Reserved Instances’ and ‘On-Demand’.
- It provides high security for accessing their database and related services.
- This relational database service engine manages automatic backup timings and backs up the transaction log for up to five minutes.
- Users can capture daily snapshots of their database instances, which are stored in Amazon S3.
- AWS RDS vs Aurora service engine automatically acquires all the patches for the database software.
Pros of RDS
- Simplified disaster recovery and automatic failover
- Maintenance of hardware
- Possesses an automatic backup
- Allocation of storage is automatic
Cons of RDS
- There are only five read replicas.
- Lacks automatic handling of compression
- There is no assurance of CPU and storage performance.
- No automatic performance optimization
- It does not provide a guarantee against data loss
- Lacks root access to the server
Useful Link: Which Cloud has Better Private Connectivity: AWS or Azure or GCP?
What Are the Ideal Use Cases for Amazon RDS?
1) Versatility Across Workloads
Amazon RDS is recognized for its versatility and ability to support diverse workloads. Whether running a small-scale application or managing large enterprise databases, RDS provides a scalable and reliable solution. This adaptability makes it suitable for businesses of varying sizes and industries.
2) Application-Centric Support
Amazon RDS is well-suited for a wide range of application scenarios, including web, mobile, and enterprise applications. Its compatibility with multiple database engines, including MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, and Oracle, ensures businesses can choose the engine that best fits their application requirements.
3) Flexibility in Technology Stacks
One of Amazon RDS’s critical strengths is its support for various database engines. This flexibility is crucial for businesses with diverse technology stacks. Whether your applications rely on MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, or Oracle, Amazon RDS provides a unified management interface, simplifying database administration across different technologies.
4) DevOps Environments and Testing
Amazon RDS is well-suited for DevOps environments, providing a scalable and automated database solution. Development and testing processes can benefit from RDS’s ease of deployment and management, allowing teams to concentrate on application development rather than database administration. With features such as automated backups and version updates, RDS streamlines the development lifecycle, making it a go-to choice for organizations that embrace DevOps practices.
5) Compliance-Driven Databases
In industries where regulatory compliance is paramount, such as healthcare or finance, Amazon RDS offers features that simplify adherence to strict compliance standards. RDS provides rest and transit encryption, ensuring data security and privacy. With built-in backup and recovery options, organizations can confidently manage databases in accordance with compliance requirements, making Amazon RDS an ideal choice for sectors with rigorous data governance standards.
Useful Link: MongoDB Vs RDBMS: Comparing the Big 2 Database Services
What Are The Factors to Consider Before Deciding Between RDS and Aurora?
We contrasted the two database services feature by feature. Before choosing between Amazon Aurora and RDS, consider some other crucial factors to determine which is best for you.
1) Cost
Aurora is typically more expensive than RDS for the same workloads. AWS Aurora pricing depends on the instance’s kind, size, and EBS volume. Instance size is primarily the determining factor, and storage is charged based on actual usage. Remember that read replicas are more expensive on both platforms.
2) Availability
Data backup is crucial for production databases, in particular. In comparison, Aurora RDS offers greater availability and resilience because of its unique storage model and the ability to perform continuous backups. She restores with a very low recovery point aim.
3) Database Engine Support
Aurora versus RDS supports only MySQL and PostgreSQL. Therefore, you must use RDS to operate additional database engines, such as SQL Server.
How Does the Performance of Amazon Aurora Compare to Amazon RDS?
Details | Amazon Aurora | Amazon RDS |
Storage | Depending on the requirement, storage can be expanded from a minimum of 10 GB to a maximum of 64 TB | RDS permits 64 TB for most engines, but for SQL servers, it allows only 16 GB |
Scalability | Aurora permits users to scale the memory and compute resources up to a maximum of 32 vCPUs and 244 GiB of RAM in a few minutes. | Same as Aurora |
Database Engine | Aurora supports two database engines – MySQL 5.6, and PostgreSQL 9.6.1 | RDS supports five database engines – Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle Database, MariaDB, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Amazon Aurora |
Replication | It supports fifteen replicas for the provision | It supports five replicas |
Pricing | It is difficult to predict the price as it mainly depends on I/O operations. | Users are allowed to try it free of charge with no minimum usage fee |
Which is better for enterprise workloads: Aurora or RDS?
When evaluating enterprise workloads in 2025, the choice between Amazon Aurora and Amazon RDS often depends on the balance of performance, resilience, and cost efficiency.
- Aurora: A purpose built cloud native relational database service, stands out for its ability to handle large scale, mission critical workloads. It outperforms MySQL by 5 times and PostgreSQL on RDS by 3 times, making it a top choice for enterprises running SaaS platforms, e-commerce backends, or global financial applications. Its near-limitless scalability and automated fault tolerance are particularly appealing.
- RDS: More versatile for organizations that need multi-engine support (MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, SQL Server, MariaDB). RDS is often a better fit for enterprises running legacy applications, where its cost efficiency is a significant advantage. Its broad compatibility further enhances its economic benefits.
Verdict: For enterprise workloads that demand performance at scale, Aurora emerges as the stronger option. On the other hand, for cost-sensitive, mixed-engine workloads, RDS remains a viable choice.
Best AWS database for mission-critical cloud applications
Mission-critical applications, where low downtime and continuous resilience are paramount, demand a reliable database solution.
- Aurora: With six-way storage replication, self-healing storage, and multi-AZ synchronous replication, Aurora is engineered for 99.99% uptime SLAs. It offers global database features with cross-region replication in under one second, supporting multinational enterprises. Aurora Multi-Master clusters ensure write availability even during failover.
- RDS: Provides reliability with Multi-AZ deployments, but failover times are typically longer than Aurora. While effective for critical applications, RDS may not meet the ultra-low-latency requirements of industries such as financial trading, healthcare, or IoT.
Verdict: For mission-critical cloud-native applications, Aurora is unequivocally the best choice in AWS’s managed DBaaS portfolio
When to use Aurora and when to use RDS on AWS?
Use Aurora when:
- Applications demand high throughput and low latency.
- Workloads are elastic and unpredictable, requiring auto-scaling.
- Enterprises need multi-region disaster recovery.
- Running SaaS platforms or mission-critical apps with strict SLAs.
Use RDS when:
- You need support for multiple database engines (Oracle, SQL Server, etc.).
- Cost predictability and budget control are top priorities.
- Workloads are legacy, steady-state, or less latency-sensitive.
- You want a straightforward, managed service that doesn’t require advanced scaling.
Verdict: Aurora is the future-ready choice for cloud-native enterprises, while RDS, with its cost-efficient model, remains a secure option for stable, legacy workloads, ensuring budget control.
Success Study: Cloud Infrastructure Automation for a Financial Services Firm
Veritis partnered with a prominent finance and insurance company to deliver end-to-end cloud infrastructure automation and enablement. A key component of this transformation involved selecting and optimizing the right database services, such as Amazon Aurora and Amazon RDS, to align with the organization’s specific performance, scalability, and compliance requirements.
By integrating automated infrastructure provisioning with tailored data management solutions, Veritis empowered the client to build a robust, secure, and scalable cloud environment. This initiative underscores the importance of harmonizing infrastructure and data strategies to achieve long-term success in highly regulated industries.
To read the complete success story, explore the full case study: Full-Fledged Infrastructure Automation and Cloud Support to Finance and Insurance Company.
Conclusion
Before adopting any database engine, organizations must weigh the pros and cons of Amazon Aurora vs. RDS services and decide based on their requirements.
Due to the manual reading of replicas with Amazon RDS, there is a case of data loss in the event of a failover. If a failover occurs, Aurora will automatically and quickly read the replica. Therefore, data loss is not possible. Comparing AWS Aurora vs RDS provides specific information on which database to use, depending on your applications’ requirements. To manage various application workloads, many firms combine various database types.
Amazon RDS is an excellent starting point if you have databases you wish to migrate to the cloud. Speak with your AWS account manager before migrating. Your AWS account manager can offer credits or expert services to help you migrate your on-premises databases to Aurora RDS. Amazon wants to help you do this. Additionally, they have the AWS Database Migration Service, an underutilized technology that performs its intended function.
Amazon Aurora and Amazon RDS are among the fastest-growing cloud platforms in database services. While both services are excellent, Amazon Aurora is the best option for any organization as it offers more features.
Although there is a slight price increase, this is worth investing in. RDS has a unique advantage over Aurora, as users can try it at no expense, and it supports more database engines.
Veritis, a distinguished IT consulting service and recipient of the Stevie and Globee business awards, stands out as a trusted partner for Fortune 500 companies. Handling everything from Enterprise Data Management solutions to Technology Advisory Services and Digital Transformation, Veritis offers a proven track record of excellence and innovation. With recognized expertise and technological acumen, Veritis is committed to guiding clients toward success in the complex realm of Managed Service Providers. As an award-winning entity, Veritis embodies reliability and a steadfast commitment to delivering tailored solutions that support client goals.
Schedule A Call With Cloud Consult
Additional Resources:
- AWS vs Azure vs GCP: Cloud Cost Comparison
- AWS Vs Azure Vs GCP – The Cloud Platform of Your Choice?
- Top 10 DevOps Tools to Pick for Your Business
- Principles that every Chief Information Officer (CIO) needs to Adopt for DevOps Acceleration
- A Guide to DevOps Implementation on Google Cloud
- Qubit Finance’s Heist Underscores Why an Able Managed Service Provider (MSP)